Author: administrator

Test – because you asked, here it is. Retiring the ol trusted website that ran for 8 years, here is Ci’s new website

We’re sorry.
We didn’t find the charity you are looking for. We have reports on over 800 charities. but apparently not the one you asked for. This matters to us.
Please try again. You can search by:

with the charity’s name and your email address and we can contact you when the report is ready.
We receive about 3,000 requests each year, which is more than our small team can do. So each year, we add about 10-20 charities that get the most donor requests. 
 
Read More

An Open Letter to Canadian Donors: Our Mischaracterization of True North Youth Foundation Inc.
 
On October 31^st, 2018 I erred in a CityNews interview calling TNYF Inc. a “puck hog” – a charity that holds onto large sums of cash.  In fact, in F2017 and F2016 TNYF Inc. drew down its funding reserves and spent $3.7 million in capital expenditures, mostly on leasehold improvements at its own Camp Manitou.
I acknowledge that TNYF Inc. has, in fact, spent money and was not holding on to cash. I regret my error and mischaracterization. Calling TNYF Inc. a “puck hog”  was rude and simply bad manners images/Defamation/TNYF-apology.pdf . Read More

Few have ever heard of the charity called Beth Oloth, including experts in Canada’s philanthropy sector. Yet, Beth Oloth was one of Canada’s largest charities. It was the same size as more familiar charities like Doctors Without Borders, Queen’s University, and United Way Montreal. On January 12, 2019, the Charities Directorate revoked Beth Oloth’s charity status. Beth Oloth has 90 days to appeal this decision.Beth Oloth is a huge Canadian charity. Beth Oloth most recently reported receiving $59.4 million in donations and grants from foundations. #_edn1″ name=”_ednref1 [i] That’s incredible fundraising for one staff and two directors acting alone.
This is a cautionary story for donors. Just because a charity is big, does not make it “good”, and just because it is getting lots of money, donors cannot neglect due diligence. For those who care about giving intelligently, there were early warning signals.
Subscribers to Charity Intelligence’s star ratings got the heads up in August 2017. Charity Intelligence rated https://www.charityintelligence.ca/charity-details/870-beth-oloth-charitable-organization Beth Oloth zero out of four stars. Our concerns made us take the extra step to add a donor advisory. Charity Intelligence’s research and rating subscription can help you give better, instead of simply using gut feel and emotion.

component/content/article/332-transparency-matters-in-canada-s-charity-sector?catid=42&Itemid=101 Charity transparency matters
component/content/article/616-what-donors-can-do-to-improve-transparency-in-canada-s-charity-sector?catid=42&Itemid=101 What donors can do to improve transparency 
 
Early warning signals
When most donors think of “bad” charities, they most likely picture small scams or hucksters going door-to-door, and not elite Canadian charities. Yet, Beth Oloth was part of our Major 100 Index, among the largest charities in Canada.
To recap, Charity Intelligence’s Major 100 index is a list of Canada’s largest 100 charities measured by donations and support from fundraising and special events. The Major 100 Index represents the elite 0.1% of Canada’s 86,000+ registered charities. Together, Canada’s Major 100 charities received $6.2 billion in donations in their most recent reported year. This is approximately 38% of total Canadian giving (assuming total Canadian annual giving is $16 billion).
Beth Oloth is the sixth of Canada’s Major 100 charities to be revoked in the last seven years. When large public companies run into problems, there is media attention alerting shareholders, as there was in the case of Enron, BreX, and Sino-Forest. Yet, donors get little notice about charities in trouble with regulators. Charity Intelligence believes early warning signals benefit intelligent donors.  
 
These Major 100 charities that were ultimately revoked look alike. None had financial transparency. Results reporting grades are all Fs using the Keystone Accountability scorecard. Donors may be tricked into believing extremely low overhead costs show great value. Yet, when overhead costs are less than 5%, donors need to pay extra attention. This is exactly why Charity Intelligence’s overhead costs analysis has an upper red zone.
 
What about Gates of Mercy?
With Beth Oloth’s revocation, comments were made about what took the Charities Directorate so long. #_edn1″ name=”_ednref1 [i] Expert charity lawyer Mark Blumberg commented “if abuses like these are allowed to continue it will undermine the public’s confidence in the whole charitable sector” and the government should be embarrassed the charity was allowed to operate for so long.
Our current laws muzzle the Charities Directorate from informing us. The Charities Directorate must follow due process and do exhaustive audits and investigations. In the Beth Oloth case, the investigation was dragged on by lawyers and spanned more than two years. It is alarming that in these two years under investigation, Beth Oloth tax receipted $49.9 million in donations and received an additional $53.9 million from private foundations. Currently, the Charities Directorate cannot suspend “trading” or notify donors until it makes its final decision. In contrast, British laws allow its Charities Commission to prominently notify the public when a charity is under investigation.
Yet the Charities Directorate is not silent in the Beth Oloth case. Its https://www.globalphilanthropy.ca/images/uploads/NITR_Beth_Oloth_Charitable_Organization_Redacted.pdf investigation notes report a curious relationship between Beth Oloth and https://www.charityintelligence.ca/charity-details/516-gates-of-mercy Gates of Mercy, another Toronto-based charity. Numerous cheques made out to Gates of Mercy were deposited into Beth Oloth’s bank account; an American GoFundMe page told supporters that money could be tax-receipted by Beth Oloth, with instructions to mail cheques to Rabbi Reidel, a director of Gates of Mercy.  In the Charities Directorate’s investigation, Beth Oloth claimed there is no ongoing relationship between itself and Gates of Mercy.
Gates of Mercy is an active charity that Charity Intelligence rates. We rate Gates of Mercy zero for its financial transparency and give it an F grade on results reporting. Its financial statements are unaudited. It has one staff that raises $10.2 million in donations. It is extremely cost-efficient with overhead costs of only 0.9%. Given these signs, Charity Intelligence has added a donor advisory.
Update: On April 4, 2019, the Charities Directorate revoked Gates of Mercy’s charity status following an audit.
 
Sources:
http://www.gazette.gc.ca/rp-pr/p1/2019/2019-01-12/html/commis-eng.html Revocation of Beth Oloth Charitable Organization, Canadian Gazette, January 12, 2019
#_ednref1″ name=”_edn1 [i] Charities Directorate annual return for Beth Oloth, accessed February 5, 2019 Charities Listing, https://apps.cra-arc.gc.ca/ebci/haip/srch/t3010form23-eng.action?b=118807080RR0001&fpe=2017-09-30 2017 Annual Return Beth Oloth, Government of Canada
#_ednref1″ name=”_edn1 [i] Stewart Bell, “ https://globalnews.ca/news/4893430/canada-charity-jewish-group-foreig-armed-forces/ Government revokes charity status of Canadian Jewish group that supported ‘foreign armed forces’, Global News, January 28, 2019
text-align: left;   

text-align: left; If you find Charity Intelligence’s research useful in your giving, please consider  https://www.charityintelligence.ca/donate donating to support our work. Being entirely funded by donors like you maintains our independence and objectivity to help Canadians be informed in their giving. Canadians donate over $17 billion each year. This giving could achieve tremendous results. We hope Charity Intelligence’s research helps Canadians give better.
Legal disclaimer:
The information in this report was prepared by Charity Intelligence Canada and its independent analysts from publicly-available information. Charity Intelligence and its analysts have made endeavours to ensure that the data in this report is accurate and complete but accepts no liability.
The views and opinions expressed are to inform donors in matters of public interest. Views and opinions are not intended to malign any religion, ethnic group, organization, individual or anyone or anything. Any dispute arising from your use of this website or viewing the material hereon shall be governed by the laws of the Province of Ontario, without regard to any conflict of law provisions. 
 

Canadian Cancer Society spending on programs for people with cancer and cancer research
News headlines in 2011 unfairly criticized Canadian Cancer Society for spending more on fundraising than on cancer research. Yes, this is factually correct, both in 2018 as it was in 2011. In F2018, Canadian Cancer Society spent $52.8 million on fundraising compared to $48.9 million spent on cancer research grants. And yes, Canadian Cancer Society does have huge fundraising costs to raise money for its operations. link to fundraising costs.
However, unlike most large cancer charities, Canadian Cancer Society has two core programs, not just one.  It runs cancer programs for people with cancer and it funds cancer research. Canada’s other large cancer charities fundraise and only grant money to cancer research. Think a United Way model, or a mutual fund. This fundraising/granting/investing work is very different from being on the frontline, working with people with cancer. Few charities provide hands on help to people living with cancer. Canadian Cancer Society is an exception.
In its cancer programs, across Canada, CCS convenes support groups, provides online resources, organizes rides to cancer treatment, operates lodges (Ronald McDonald-type housing for adult cancer patients undergoing treatment), and loans wigs to people with cancer. At every cancer treatment centre across Canada, Canadian Cancer Society volunteers provide refreshments to patients waiting for cancer treatments.
In 2018, in addition to its research grants of $48.9 million, Canadian Cancer Society spent $51.4 million on cancer support programs. Cancer programs, research grants, and advocacy totaled $103.6 million in 2018. When undertaking a fair assessment of fundraising costs, spending on cancer research and cancer programs must also be considered.
 
Sources:
Jason Kirby, https://www.macleans.ca/economy/business/buy-sell-donate/  “Buy, sell, donate: A new breed of analysts is using investing techniques to better scrutinize the booming charity business”, Macleans Business, July 28, 2011 
Erica Johnson, https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/cancer-society-spends-more-on-fundraising-than-research-1.1080909  “Cancer Society spends more on fundraising than research”, CBC News, July 6, 2011